Capital:Case Study
Work through the following tasks to build a detailed case study for Capital. This will give you plenty of background information to use in an exam question. Remember, for this CSP the question could be on any of the key concepts: language, industries, audiences or representations.
Reviews and Features
Read the following review and feature on Capital:
Guardian review by Sam Wollaston
London Evening Standard: five things you need to know about Capital
Read the following review and feature on Capital:
Guardian review by Sam Wollaston
London Evening Standard: five things you need to know about Capital
1) What positive points does the review pick out about Capital? What criticisms are made - either of the TV drama or the original novel?
"They have managed to squeeze an incredible amount into one street, one book, and then further squeeze into three hours of television. A lot of the important stuff, as well as what is most wonderful and most terrible about the place.
It shows sympathetic and unsympathetic characters and the representation of the neighbourhood in Capital is identical to how most neighbourhoods look like in London.
Trailer analysis
Watch the trailer for Capital:
1) How does the drama use camerawork to capture London life?Ariel shot that shows the compact neighbourhoods of London
2) How does the trailer introduce the different narrative strands suggesting tension or enigma in the 40-second running time?
With the setting it sometimes shows the inside of the characters houses and them having dinner and conversations. It also shows casual, every day clothing. Facial expressions of the characters when they're having dinner gives the audience a sense of a close relationship and happiness between the family.
Capital offers a range of fascinating representations - from London and asylum seekers to capitalism and inequality. You need to be able to confidently discuss these issues in the context of 2015 London - with reference to key scenes from episode 1. Representations include: London, family, gender, ethnicity, religion, immigration, asylum, inequality, wealth, capitalism, aging and more.
1) Write an analysis of the representations in each of the key scenes from episode 1 we studied in the lesson:
Scene 1: opening sequence 00:30 – 4.49
Scene 2: work in the City 6.28 – 8.10
Scene 3: “Which of those isn’t absolutely essential?” 14.00 – 15.35
Scene 4: asylum 18.03 – 19.42 AND 31.10 – 32.40
Scene 5: “What use is 30 grand?” 36.40 – 39.00
Scene 6: life at the corner shop 40.10 – 42.55
You can choose which aspects to focus on for each scene: e.g. London, family, gender, ethnicity, religion, immigration, asylum, inequality, wealth, aging etc. Feel free to use bullet points for each scene - a summary of your notes is fine.
Scene 1 (00:30 - 4:49)
London
-Dark, suggests manipulation - building the narrative
-Busy, scaffolding and people moving in and out
-Old, house prices going up each year
-Familiar and recognisable
FGER
-Muslims, seeks, Hindus, Pakistanis, West Indians, Indians all migrating to England
-Male + Female
-West asian, British.
-We see families still together and families apart because of death. Starts off in 1960’s to 2015.
-Ethnic diversity
-Subverting stereotypes
-Traditional gender roles
-Similarities between different ethnic groups
-“He’ll be volunteering for Syria next.”
CWIW
-Wealth, old lady says that everyone on the street are millionaires due to house price inflation
-Pakistani family - lower to middle class, entrepreneurial, stereotypical
-Animation to show the increase of house prices.
-Dynamic, constantly changing
IAA
-Immigrants moving to England, increasing population and demanding of housing, therefore increasing house price
-Houses aging start to increase in value, but everyone is slowly aging as well
-1960’s to 2015
-Colour saturation signified the past (bright and colourful).
Scene 2 (6:28 - 8:10)
London
-Busy
-Overpopulated
-Crowded
-Big buildings, expensive, bird’s eye shot of everything
-Noisy
-Contrasts from the suburbs
-London, the iconic representation of capitalism
FGER
-Distant because of work
-No diversity between gender
-Swiss boss
-diversity in the capital, before he goes into work
-White, privileged men
-Banking and finance, masculine
-Male driven
-Competitive
CWIW
-Cocky dialogue
-Big buildings
-Sense of high ground is established
-Sense of trying to be a better worker than someone else.
-Strong feeling of capitalism at play with the cocky dialogue and sophisticated language
-Suits and briefcases
-London, the Iconic representation of capitalism
-Global capitalism
IAA
-
Scene 3(14:00 - 15:35)
London
-
FGER
-Conflicting
-Seemed to be kept up for financial reasons
-Distant
-Pointless
-Roger thinks he can get cheeky with the breast after chatting that work money bollocks
-Middle-class family
-Comic
-Stereotype of middle class people
-His wife is a gold digger
-Loveless marriage
-Exploiting Roger: Robbing him off a great time
CWIW
-Work getting in the way of the relationship
-Cost of living is incredibly high
-Roger saying that “£1m isn’t enough to live off of these days”
Scene 4(18:03-19:42 and 31:10-32:40)
London
-Uninviting
-Too overpopulated
-Wanting to kick out people
-Lack of remorse
FGER
-Christianity is a big part in said characters life
CWIW
-
IAA
-Risky
-Threat of death, threat of rape
-Not safe
-An escape
-Not properly cared for
-Horrible management
-Lack of remorse
-Sympathy for said character
-Can’t earn the exact money made
Capital was produced by independent production company Kudos for the BBC. Look at the Kudos website and also read the Kudos Wikipedia page.
1) Who is the parent company for Kudos? What changes of ownership have there been for Kudos? This is an example of conglomerate ownership.
2) Watch the showreel on the Kudos website. What other TV dramas have Kudos produced and for which channels? What awards have they won?
Comments
Post a Comment